Sunday, September 4, 2016

Closing Thoughts with Piaget...



Circling back to the basics, I investigated some of what Piaget has to say about prior knowledge and its impact on learning. Just as I read through his work, I read along with some of Ball's research on the impact of teacher's expectations of mathematics on the effectiveness of their instruction. This connection helped me to make one of the most important discoveries in my research- how both student and teacher are learners in the classroom, and the prior knowledge that both parties bring to the lesson impact their expectations and learning at all moments.

First, Piaget, who starts with young students and their first learning experiences with means-ends actions. As children grow, they learn that specific actions can lead to a more desirable second action. They create schemas and expectations. As a result, their learning from this desired action is shaped by the previous action- prior knowledge and experience.



“perform one action in order to do a second action…the second action is usually the more desirable action” (Piaget, 27)

“Means-ends sequencing is essential to adult intellectual functioning because it’s what allows us to make plans about the future” (Piaget, 27)




“Old schemas aren’t activated for their own sake, they are activated for the sake of making other schemas possible” (Piaget, 32)



And then, with Ball, and the expectations of teachers in mathematical education. Teachers approach math with ideas that impact their teaching- the concept is difficult, students will struggle, etc. Just as with students prior knowledge, the teachers enter their classroom with experiences and opinions that impact their teaching.


“Mathematics does not have much relationship to the real world and most mathematical ideas cannot be represented any way other than abstractly, with symbols” (Ball, 4)


“prospective teachers also bring ideas of what mathematics is—what it is about, what it is good for, where it comes from, and how right answers are established—that shape their understanding of and approach to the subject” (Ball, 10)

Growth Mindset in Mathematics


Encouragement through Community Learning



“the key growth mindset message was that effort changes the brain by forming new connections, and that students control this process” (Boaler, 144)
This effort is present when students are learning in a responsive environment, where the focus is on the problem solving skill development, not on finding the correct answer or memorizing the method.

“The awareness that ability is malleable and that students need to develop productive growth mindsets ha profound implications for teaching. Teachers and schools constantly communicate messages to students about their ability and learning through their practices in which they engage and the conversations they have with students” (Boaler, 145)


“When tasks are more open, offering opportunities for learning, students can see the possibility of higher achievement and respond to these opportunities to improve” (Boaler, 146)
Rather than restrict students in ability grouped learning models, allowing for growth gives students the chance to develop their thinking. When students have the chance to constantly learn and improve their understanding, they connect and build upon new and old skills, allowing for more naturally fluid instruction.


Culturally Responsive Classroom

-respectful of students learning supports and strengths
-mobility achievable
-supported risk taking
-focus on thinking
-respect and emphasis on making mistakes


VS

Ability Grouping

-unchallenged
-competitive atmosphere
-students division is known
-rigid levels
-supported accurate problem solving
-emphasis on the answer


Conceptual vs Procedural Understanding

Preparing our students for authentic problem solving

How do we make mathematic education accessible for students?
How are students encourage and able to apply mathematical processes in authentic, problem solving situations?


Quick recap- Boaler observed and researched behavior of teacher and student in two different classroom settings. The first, where student's math education was based on procedural understanding, and the second, built on conceptual understanding. I tracked the differences between the two settings below:


Findings suggest that authentic, self-directed, project-based learning teaches the skills that allow students to think critically and apply mathematical knowledge to new contexts

SKILLS

1. Willingness and ability to perceive and interpret different situations and develop meaning from them and relation to them
2. A sufficient understanding of the procedures to allow appropriate procedures to be selected
3. A mathematical confidence that enabled students to adapt and change procedures to fit new situations



Ball and Boaler- How to Teach Mathematics



In keeping a culturally responsive classroom, what is the role of the teacher?
What actions are made by the teacher in order to provide for an environment for students to take supported risks in learning?
How does capacity of mathematical knowledge impact the effectiveness of math instruction?

Thoughts...
“Develop an inquiry relationship with mathematics, approaching math with curiosity, courage, confidence, and intuition” (Boaler)
This approach encompasses both the student and teacher perspective necessary for inquiry based learning to be effective in mathematics. It is interesting how the two positions in the classroom become a mirror for the other- this equality in approach and goal maintain both the teacher and student as learners, opening the discussion for divergent thinking processes.

“Are assessed formatively- to inform learning- not summatively to give rank with their peers” (Boaler)

Here, Boaler speaks specifically to a teacher's responsibility in the classroom- assessment. Formative assessment holds students accountable for their learning in an authentic way, as the teacher takes note simultaneous to student learning and development. This type of assessment allows the teacher to jump right in and address misconceptions and guide building ideas. In addition, the teacher learns, constantly adapting instruction with questions to guide deeper thinking.
"Mistakes are valuable, they encourage brain growth and learning” (Boaler)
“A mathematics algorithm invented by a student, for example, must not be diagnosed as a mistake simply because it deviates from the teacher’s way of arriving at a solution” (Ball, 8)

Duckworth, Boaler, and Ball enter the same playing field here- when students and teachers are both learners in the classroom, mistakes are encouraged and supported. With a classroom culture that appreciates mistakes, students and teachers take opportunities of missed problems as a chance for positive thinking development.
“My purpose is to encourage them to talk about what they think is going on to get them to figure out the idea of permutations for themselves” (Ball, 6)

Talking- what I've learned to be vital to an inquiry community, and the backbone of effective mathematics instruction. When students get talking about their thinking, they are able to make connections and fill in the gaps in what they know. The ability to explain and teach is ranked high in Bloom's taxonomy, and is threaded within all aspects of the Mathematics Common Core standards for mathematical practice. Students and teachers get talking, question and learn from each other, and develop their thinking.
“By the end of our time together, I had learned not only how valuable questions were to teaching, but I realized that how I asked them and when I asked them made a big difference…I could steer her with the word “why?” and although it was very subtle, it made her look deeper” (Ball, 13)

And here, how teachers make that talking possible- asking effective questions as a coach, helping students to use language while explaining their understanding of new mathematical concepts.

“if you know your subject matter well, (inside and out), it is easier to find different explanations and examples. You can’t be tied down to just one way of doing a problem” (Ball, 11)
Finally, some accountability for math teachers understanding content. So many times I've heard teacher candidates say they chose early elementary to avoid math, or they don't have to worry because they are 'just teaching 3rd grade math'- WRONG! These math lessons are the ground work for math problem solving for the rest of our students lives. When teachers have an incredible hold on this knowledge, they are able to fluidly address students questions, understanding student-invented algorithms, and uncover misconceptions. A high level of mathematical understanding is vital in effective math education.

Thursday, April 14, 2016

Vygotsky, Mind in Society



“Any learning a child encounters in school always has a previous history” (84)

Thinking more about constructivism as a learning theory has brought me to explore the ideas of Vygotsky. His thinking about student's development and learning is directly connected to the ideas I have already explored about inquiry based learning. This discovery has helped me to build a greater understanding of constructive learning as an overarching theme in learning.

Vygotsky introduces the idea of prior knowledge and how it impacts learning. I have thought a lot about this idea with my readings of Geneva Gay, specifically how culture specific prior knowledge impacts learning. Students come with knowledge that can be a beneficial tool to their learning in the classroom.

‘For example, children begin to study arithmetic in school, but long beforehand they have had some experience with quantity-they have had to deal with operations of division, addition, subtraction, and determination of size” (84)

Vygotsky also talks about the Zone of Proximal Development- the area where this prior knowledge supports new learning to reach an attainable goal. 

“We propose that an essential feature of learning is that it creates the zone of proximal development; that is, learning awakens a variety of internal developmental processes that are able to operate only when the child is interacting with people in his environment and in cooperation with his peers. Once these processes are internalized, they become part of the child’s independent developmental achievement” (90)




And finally, perhaps the strongest connection to Dewey, is the impact of collaboration with learning in the ZPD. Social learning comes into play, as students work together and communicate to achieve this learning. 

“It is the distance between the actual development level as determined by independent problem solving and the level of potential development as determined through problem solving under adult guidance or in collaboration with more capable peers” (86)




Tuesday, March 22, 2016

"Knowing is a process, not a product" (Bruner, 72)


Why is it so important to integrate theory of instruction into effective pedagogy?

"But a theory of instruction, which must be at the heart of educational psychology, is principally concerned with how to arrange environments to optimize learning according to various criteria" (Bruner, 37)

Bruner supplies an answer to this arrangement, highlighting the 4 features of effective instruction:



When applied, this instruction method provides a way for students to focus on skill development in order to increase their readiness. Bruner also stresses the importance of applicable learning, and that without an authentic application, "the information is simply useless" (53).

This idea of effective and connected learning connects directly to the major themes and ideas which Professor Diana at WSU expressed when discussing her place based honors level college course. Her goals for the course challenged students to think critically, come to creative conclusions, and take away a greater sense of confidence and involvement in their ability to make effective change.

Most interesting, however, was Professor Diana's perspective and role in her course. Rather than see herself as an instructor, Diana explained her position as more of a 'writing coach'. Serving as a guide, Diana helped her students write strong, effective papers, which attacked arguments and problems generated by her students. Rather than provide material, Diana led her students towards and through new ideas and skills.

As Bruner would most likely agree, the results were powerful. Students left Diana's class feeling empowered to make change. After an end of semester reflection, students reported to feel as if now, they had the skills and knowledge to become active members of their current and future communities. 



During our conversation about students learning in this inquiry model, the idea of anxiety and discomfort arose. Diana reported that some of her students struggled with the lack of structure given in the course; the student's freedom in learning was new and overwhelming.

I couldn't help but think about the clear connection to what I read in Denise Pope's "Doing School". These high school students reported that ""Everybody" does the minimum required to get by and everybody focuses on grades instead of learning the material" (Pope, 28). How much of this anxiety in college is created based on student's lack of opportunity in learning during high school? And, how does this lack of opportunity start to grow in the elementary levels? It seems that, as we get to college, where learning is structured to be so authentic and applicable, we lack the skills necessary to succeed. According to Bruner, these skills are vital; "a curriculum should involve the mastery of skills that, in turn, lead to the mastery of still more powerful ones, the establishment of self-reward sequences" (Bruner, 35). The disconnect of skills and experience, ranging from elementary school to college, shows the impact of neglecting Bruner's 4 essential features, and in this situation especially, effective sequence.


  • Where else does this disconnect occur?
  • Is there disconnect in the way that the Investigations math program is taught throughout the grade levels?
  • What about the connection between a school's mission statement and the math program which they use? Does the mission statement and program goals align?



"Rather, it is to teach him to participate in the process that makes possible the establishment of knowledge. We teach a subject not to produce little living libraries on that subject, but rather to get a student to think mathematically for himself" (Bruner, 72)





Sunday, February 28, 2016

Constructivist Learning Theorists



Where do the theorists fit in with this connection between community and learning?


Dewey

"The relationship between knowledge and reality is a result of individual and social experiences (Ultanir, 199)

"learner centered and less teacher dominated learning environment" (Ultanir, 201)

"the child own experience must be acknowledged" (Ultanir, 206)


The idea of social experience and its impact on learning is closely related to Bruner's ideas of engagement. Social discussion provides students with authentic motivation and a reason to apply and develop their problem solving skills.


Piaget

"continuous and gradual change of schema" (Jones)

"the most frequent cause of accommodation is the interaction, and especially linguistic interaction, with others" (Glaserfeid, 66)

"motivation to master new problems is most likely to spring from having enjoyed the satisfaction of finding solutions to problems in the past" (Glaserfeid, 181)

This gradual change supports the instructional practice of connecting prior knowledge with new learning, using each lesson and activity to build on a big idea rather than focus on specific content points.

Vygotsky

"social interaction leads to gradual, incremental changes in thought and behavior (adapted from the cultural and societal norms)" (Jones)

A direct connection to the importance of a classroom community.This raises the question of what are these cultural and societal norms? Are they different in and out of the classroom? In school, are we teaching students to norms of our society, or teaching them to seek out norms in order to understand social arrangement and communication?

Bruner

"effective instruction is engaging and stimulating to student minds" (Jones)
"set purpose for learning- motivate further exploration" (Jones)


How do the verbs we use in student objectives define their learning experience?



What are our expectations of education and how does these expectations impact the learning models used in classrooms?

What is the difference between memory and understanding? How do we assess this difference? 

Wednesday, February 17, 2016

The Having of Wonderful Ideas, Eleanor Duckworth



"Having confidence in one's ideas does not mean "I know my ideas are right"; it means "I am willing to try out my ideas" (Duckworth, 5)

What is a wonderful idea?

How do ideas grow from ideas?

How do educators encourage students to arrive at wonderful ideas?



Why are students ideas significant?

When students come to the realization that their ideas, values, thoughts, and skills are significant, they become confident in their ability to learn and share. Student's develop self respect for their own thoughts and are more willing to share and converse with classmates about their ideas. An inclusive environment harvests this growth in self-confidence, helping students solidify their ideas. When students see their ideas as significant, they begin to ask meaningful questions to  help grow their ideas even further.

"One can familiarize children with a few phenomena in such a way as to catch their interest, to let them raise and answer their own questions, to let them realize that their ideas are significant- so that they have the interest, the ability, and the self-confidence to go on by themselves" (Duckworth, 8)

Learning models that are so focused on getting to the final answer are preventing students from learning the important skills locked inside the struggle of problem solving: (Duckworth, 67) 
surprise
puzzlement
struggle
excitement
anticipation
dawning certainty

This lack of divergent exploration connects to the ideas recorded by students in the novel "Doing School" by Pope. Student's who have mastered the art of doing school correctly, meaning getting college-ready grades and preparing strong community service-based resumes, express their frustrations and missed opportunities to learn.

When, where, and why did we change from learning through play to learning for preparation?









The Inclusive Classroom

What happens to inquiry learning if the teacher does not meet these role requirements?

http://quotesgram.com/inquiry-quotes/
If the educator does not complete their role in the learning process, how does student's inquiry suffer?

Inquiry based learning occurs with the establishment and development of an inclusive classroom environment. Inclusion create a safe place to learn.
  • recognize, respect, and incorporate student's prior knowledge and experiences
  • comfort to take risks
  • consider academic/social strengths and weaknesses of individual learners
  • focus on the process skills
  • reflection and development of the community- what works? what doesn't?

But what happens when this inclusive community is not established? 
The focus of learning shifts from the process to the answer.

Inquiry without a supported community is superficial. Students who are not comfortable to ask questions and take risks cannot achieve higher order process skills and are forced back into the habit of simply problem solving to find one correct answer.

I think that this idea of an inclusive classroom reaches past just teaching with a culturally relevant perspective. Or, perhaps the idea of inclusion is locked within this theory. When I think of a culturally relevant classroom, I think of a place where all students are recognized and respected as learners. This does not necessary mean in a diverse setting where students have various backgrounds. Any classroom, regardless of the student demographics, must be inclusive of all learners with varied strengths, weaknesses, and experiences. This is true culturally relevant teaching, and the heart of the environment necessary for inquiry based learning of successfully occur.

Wednesday, February 10, 2016

Culturally Responsive Teaching: Theory, Research, and Practice and Education and Racism: A Primer on Issued and Dilemmas


How does culturally responsive teaching foster inquiry learning?


Inquiry learning is rooted in students ability to think.
Students ability to think is influenced by their prior knowledge.
Prior knowledge is developed based on experience.
Culture experiences, and expectations impact their home-school connection.



Learning with the inquiry model just does not seem to work without creating an inclusive, supportive, and safe classroom community. In order for students to take risks in their work, asking questions, creating solutions, and analyzing their work, their learning space must be supportive.

As it is now, students who arrive at school with a home culture that matches that of the institution are tracked more easily towards academic success. 

Students, however, should not just assimilate into their school community, but build it. Within this creation, students look for recognition and respect for the knowledge and experience they each bring from home.

Can culture be used as a tool to create authentic problems and activities, especially in math? I am still thinking about this one. It seems like incorporating culture into math problems is too superficial and would not actually make the problems more 'real'. I think the value of incorporating the classroom into students diverse cultures is within community building. Students bring different sets of problem solving skills based on personal experiences. Application of their problem solving strengths highlights students individuality. Encouraging development of their weaknesses helps build the learning community.

Educators can "reconsider their culture as a source of knowledge, strength, and having something to offer schools" (Leonardo, 61). Perhaps culture and respect plays more of a role in the way the classroom teacher works with her students. Knowledge of different norms and expectations that each student brings to the classroom impacts their learning style. Here, culture becomes a tool for the teacher- they can quickly adapt how to provide each student with individualized support.

"The class was never an individual effort!" 
(Gay, 163)- and nor should it be. Inquiry is community learning.



Wednesday, January 27, 2016

Guidelines and Goals of Observation- Ethnographic Eyes


"Ethnography helped us ask critical questions about supervision, classroom observations, lesson plans, reflections, interviews, data collection, and case studies" (Frank, 2)

In order to fully embrace inquiry learning, I plan to approach my classroom observations with an inquiry based model of ethnographic observations. I will become a learner in the classrooms, rather than simply an observer. My questions, observations, and inferences will help to grow and develop my own understanding of inquiry in the classroom and increase my own experience with the learning model.


What to look for?
  • patterns and routines that impact the learning community
  • student's role, and how it changes with the topic, lesson, and time
  • teacher's role, how and when questions are asked to further student learning
  • "suspend judgement" in order to take in authentic information from both student and teacher
  • environmental factors that allow for inquiry to occur

Dewey's Suggestions... (177)
Serving as a rubric for my own observations and inferences

"It is organized as a social community; children are learning in the active setting of a miniature community"

"The social significance of subject matter is brought out in instruction"

"Children are involved in solving real problems, past and present. The subjects in the curriculum are integrated in the way that they work and are synthesized in the real world"

"Teachers confer frequently, informally and formally"

"Children are free to move around the room and seek help from others"

"The school takes advantage of cultural and educational institutions in the community to enrich the curriculum and children's lives"

"The children are happy"





Dewey's Laboratory School: Lessons for Today






"Always the spirit of service involved thinking, not just doing" (4)

In his analysis of his laboratory school, Dewey brings forward the importance of thinking in learning, rather than just learning by doing. This has shifted the language with which I associate inquiry learning. Prior to reading, the first think I think of with inquiry is 'doing'. Dewey makes it clear that this learning is actually most successfully described with the word 'thinking', connecting to making observations, inferences, and asking questions.

"Its purpose was not teaching but learning" (15)

Dewey's Ingredients and Conditions for Effective Inquiry (85-86)
Ingredients:
  1. Lessons match students developmental level
  2. Prep students to become citizens
  3. Skills based on observation and inference
Conditions:
  1. Student interest
  2. Engaged thought
  3. Increases new curiosity and questions
  4. Time spent on effective development and connections




Big Ideas
  • Students are learning and acting as effective, active, and involved citizens
    • Cultivate skills to achieve this goal: problem solving, questioning, social/conversation (2-3)
    • Big ideas > general knowledge of content
  • Broad knowledge and citizen development connect strongly to the activation of culturally relevant teaching
    • Students come to school without similar problem solving skills (3)
    • Learning identifies commonalities in communities and groups of citizens
    • Learning model impacts classroom community/dynamics and classroom management (122)
    • Education which meets diverse needs, addressing each student's skills rather than mastery of specific content (129)
    • Students think of themselves as learners, active and involved (161)
  • Teachers learn theory before skill (165)
    • Curriculum is infused with teaching and learning goals; pedagogy comes first (24, 31)
  • Construction of lessons and activities
    • Stimulus Response Theory- using student's interests as a tool (43)
    • Construction of lesson plans allow students to approach and apply mathematics learning (70)
      • problems are authentic and applied to student's lives
    • Lessons and activities build on each other, not repeat (161)
Questions for Further Reading

How does inquiry address higher order thinking, beyond observation, inference, and questioning?

How does this model correlate with teaching organized bodies of knowledge?

How does our current curriculum and learning model in mathematics limit knowledge and experience?

How does math education become authentic and effectively applied?

What does learning in a circuit model look like?

Are these ingredients and condition currently applied in elementary math curriculum? Will I observe these conditions?


What is Inquiry?




Samantha Lee
Westfield State Elementary Education Student
Runner
Big Sister
Future Teacher



         When I become a classroom teacher, I want to encourage my students to be active in their learning. Learning by doing will encourage my students to retain important information and experiences. My classroom will be centered on student's experience, using effective questions to guide my students through discovery. 
Inquiry based activities give students an opportunity to take ownership of their learning, constructing knowledge through questioning and exploration. Lessons are student centered, holding each student to a high expectation of involvement and responsibility. An initial interest in an inquiry learning style developed early in my college education experience, sparking my desire to develop my own engaging teaching style. I believe that students should be immersed in their learning, asking questions and making discoveries in order to construct understanding. Based on my research, I hope to prove that inquiry is an effective method to reach these goals for student achievement. My work will uncover how teachers implement this style. As I research, I will search for techniques teachers use to ask expert questions and make decisions each moment about what questions will probe student’s thinking and abilities. A goal for my research is to determine what teacher skills are necessary to reach success within inquiry teaching. In addition, I will determine how student expectations and classroom communities impact the effectiveness of inquiry.
I hope that this research project will allow me the opportunity to discover effective methods and pedagogy that support inquiry based learning.
Photo Link: http://www.mrsplemonskindergarten.com/2014/09/positively-pinspiring-inquiry-and.html